[Ethics]Environmental ethics

The global warming is becoming a more serious problem every year, or more than this, every day. Although Al Gore seems so optimistic in the end of film "An Inconvenient Truth", I still think that Gore was not tell the Truth, even though it's called an inconvenient "Truth". Al Gore tell us all the terrible result about the global warming, but he only lightly touch the issue that "how can we do to cure the global warming".

Actually, the global warming is not an environmental problem, but economical, and political. The film mentioned that those developing countries still using the high pollution way to generate electric power, and it'll create very much carbon dioxide, which the prime culprit of global warming. And it leads to another question, "why these developing countries choose the high pollution way to generate electric power?" I think it an economical question. You see, the eco-friendly ways have two obvious features. The first one is they are all hi-tech. And the second is they are all low efficiency. So why should a straitened developing country use the more expensive but less effective way, though it's eco-friendly? Why should I use aerogenerator, when I have huge mineral resource of coal in my land? And the interesting thing is that those developed countries have created all the carbon dioxide since 1900 so they can became the "developed" countries, then while they get "developed", they started to ask those developing countries not to created carbon dioxide, like they used to do. Isn't is funny?

The only way to stop global warming, is that we find a new cheap and effective way to make energy, and it also have to be eco-friendly. Is it possible? I hope so.