About the question that "there are so many peoples dying in hunger,
should we save them?" I think that is still the same question : "what's the value of life?"
I think that life is priceless, but life is not equal. If life is equal, than that won't be a question. Cause, you see, If every life is equal, that we have no right to put the end to other's life. So we should do every thing we can to save the other's life, cause we all have the same right to live, if we don't protect their "right to live", that ourselves' right is unstable.
But, why we discuss about this question? Cause we're thinking about that "should we sacrifice our benefits, to save other's life." That's cold, isn't it? Why we think that? It's because we think we have more "right to live", more than those dying people have - we think our life is much valuable than their.
So it gonna be a internal question, internal dilemma. We all want to live, it's our natural. And sometimes, to live, we don't care to sacrifice other's right. Because sometimes, the resources is not enough for all of us.
嗯，感觸良多的議題。就我聽聞的消息(石油公司)，世界石油的儲量還夠用個兩百年。但為什麼總是聽說石油要用完了呢？一個想法是消息有誤。40年指的是開採中油田的儲量。另一個想法是為了哄抬油價。
回覆刪除資源的確是有限的，水與食物更是如此。大家都有心想幫助人，但把錢從口袋掏出來就是另一回事了。
この問題、あなた言ったことがあるね。
回覆刪除この世で、あたしより苦しい悲しい人はまだ多い。
だからあたしは生きる。（死の資格がない？）
でも今のあたしは何もできず、能力やお金もないし。
何が出来るのはまだ分からない、けどやってみたい。
いつか、誰を守るの力があるの日は叶うまで。
(太丟臉了所以不爽打中文)
To 阿安：
回覆刪除（攤手）問題的核心還是在於，地球上的人太多了。而且醫療與科技的發達，又使得人類喪失了自然淘汰弱勢基因的天擇能力；換言之，人類這個種族正在漸漸失去生存競爭的優勢…所以，到底該不該幫忙弱勢呢？真是大哉問。
To 涼：
回覆刪除沒關係，我看得懂…（拍拍）