為響應政府網路分級制度,本站全部內容為限制級。未滿十八歲的小朋友趕快關掉網頁去玩皮卡丘打排球吧。

[Ethics]9/23

About the issue that "laws must aimed at the goodness of the whole society", I have a question. At 18th, In Prussia, there was a king named Friedrich Wilhelm I, who was known as "the Soldier-King". The king Friedrich is not really a merciful king, he treated whole country as an giant army barracks. He made Prussia a huge powerful army in vary short time. To do that, some time he used some "sruel way".

But it's worthy, he made a vary good foundation. Prussia, from a weak small country, became a big powerful country of Europe.

If we only consider the result, Friedrich I really made the goodness of the whole society. But in the other hand, during that process, lot of people's rights were sacrificed. But Friedrich I need to do this, or the country would be conquered by the others.

"Could we sacrifice the few people's goodness, for the whole society's?"
That gonna be a question.

沒有留言:

張貼留言

已經到底了,不要再拉了!